On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:43:35PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > This is my version 13 of the attempt at adding support for generic PCI host > > bridge controllers. It contains only cleanups to make it play nice with the > > linux-next tree as of 09/25. If Bjorn deems it safe, now that it looks like > > asm-generic is going to revert some of its more aggresive patches, he has the > > choice of queueing it into linux-next again. > > ... > > These patches above were already on my pci/host-generic branch and in > linux-next: > > asm-generic/io.h: Fix ioport_map() for !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP This ^ ... > of/pci: Add pci_register_io_range() and pci_pio_to_address() > ARM: Define PCI_IOBASE as the base of virtual PCI IO space and this ^ need to be refreshed from my series otherwise we will get conflicts with asm-generic branch (either now or in the future). While the asm-generic/io.h cast is arguably superflous, we need to define PCI_IOBASE as a void __iomem* to match all other standard declarations of PCI_IOBASE. > of/pci: Define of_pci_range_to_resource() only when CONFIG_PCI=y > of/pci: Move of_pci_range_to_resources() to of/address.c > of/pci: Fix the conversion of IO ranges into IO resources > > I added these three patches to my pci/host-generic branch: > > PCI: Add generic domain handling > of/pci: Add pci_get_new_domain_nr() and of_get_pci_domain_nr() > of/pci: Add support for parsing PCI host bridge resources from DT I can see these patches added to pci/host-generic but not on pci/next. > > Yinghai pointed out a problem with this one, so I omitted it: > > PCI: Assign unassigned bus resources in pci_scan_root_bus() Thats fine, host bridge drivers will have to work around pci_scan_root_bus() reduced functionality for now. > > I added this one to my pci/host-generic branch: > > PCI: Add pci_remap_iospace() to map bus I/O resources > > I assume this depends on the pci_scan_root_bus() change (if not, let me > know), so I omitted this one: > > arm64: Add architectural support for PCI No, there is no dependency there on pci_scan_root_bus(), it can go in the series. The only thing that depends on a feature rich pci_scan_root_bus() is the host bridge driver in order to be able to use only one line to process the root bus. Thanks for huge support in getting these patches in and I do hope I'm not being too much of a burden to you. Best regards, Liviu > > Bjorn > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
