On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:13:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Compatibles can come in two formats. Either "vendor,ip-soc" or > "vendor,soc-ip". Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a > DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new > compatibles, except few existing patterns. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> [...] > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..0be18c1d2961 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml [...] > + pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$" FWIW: There is also the "qcm" prefix, used e.g. in "qcom,qcm2290-tlmm". Also, the APQ equivalent of "sdm" would be "sda", e.g. SDA845 which is used in the DB845c. (Not sure if someone will ever use the SDA variant in a compatible though.) Thanks, Stephan
