On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:41:31PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> Hi Nícolas,
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 19:24 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:13:56PM +0800, Allen-KH Cheng wrote:
> > > Add display nodes and gce info for mt8192 SoC.
> > >
> > > GCE (Global Command Engine) properties to the display nodes in
> > > order to
> > > enable the usage of the CMDQ (Command Queue), which is required for
> > > operating the display.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 136
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > > index a07edc82d403..26d01544b4ea 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
[..]
> > > + rdma0: rdma@14007000 {
> > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-rdma";
> >
> > dtbs_check is complaining that there isn't a "mediatek,mt8183-disp-
> > rdma"
> > fallback compatible here. But given that the rdma driver matches
> > directly to the
> > mt8192 compatible, I think the node here is fine, and the binding is
> > the one
> > that should be updated.
> >
>
> I have checked the binding and driver again.
>
> I prefer use "mediatek,mt8186-disp-rdma" as fallback and remove mt8192
> compatible and data in mtk_disp_rdma.c because they are the same with
> mt8183.
>
> Do you think it is okay?
Sure, that sounds good to me as well.
Thanks,
Nícolas
