On 22-06-29 19:51:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 29/06/2022 18:44, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote: > > From: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@xxxxxxx> > > > > Changes since v5: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220616164303.790379-1-viorel.suman@xxxxxxx/ > > * Updated according to Krzysztof Kozlowski comments > > > > My comment a about removal of each part of TXT bindings in each patch, > was not addressed. Your approach makes it more difficult to read patches > and makes sense only if each subsystem maintainer will take the patches > (separately). If the patches are going through one tree, then better to > remove the TXT gradually. > > So the question - who is going to take each of the patches? Hi Krzysztof, I just understood the context of your comment, will do it in the next version. Assuming TXT is removed from aggregating TXT - fsl,scu.txt - gradually, do you expect the removed to be added into the aggregating YAML - fsl,scu.yaml - also gradually within the same patch ? Thank you, Viorel
