Hi Tommaso, On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:12:47PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:02:32AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:07:19AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > On 30/06/2022 09:45, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > > > > Add documentation of device tree in YAML schema for the OV5693 > > > > > CMOS image sensor from Omnivision > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> > > > > > > > > How Sakari's tag appeared here? There was no email from him. > > > > > > Sakari made me some review on v2, but I think he forgot to add the mailing > > > list in cc. ( I suppose :) ) > > > > > > Let me know if I need to remove this. > > > > You're only supposed to put these tags into patches if you get them in > > written form as part of the review, signalling acceptance of the patch in > > various forms. Just commenting a patch does not imply this. > > > > Please also see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more > > information on how to use the tags. > > Thanks for sharing this. My bad. > I remove your tags. The patches themselves seem fine. I'd just drop the 4th patch or at least come up with a better name for ov5693_hwcfg() --- you're acquiring resources there, and that generally fits well for probe. The code is fine already. -- Sakari Ailus
