On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:41:15AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote: > > Update the dt-bindings of the i2c-stm32 drivers to avoid the > > needs for a reset property in the device-tree. > > That is clear from the diff, but why. Some chips don't have a reset? > If so, this should be combined with patch 2 as part of changes needed > for a new version. What do you mean? Patches 1+2 should be squashed together? I can do this when applying. Or do you mean something else? > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml > > index dccbb18b6dc0..8879144fbbfb 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml > > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ required: > > - compatible > > - reg > > - interrupts > > - - resets > > - clocks > > > > unevaluatedProperties: false > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
