On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>
> On 6/28/2022 1:12 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/27/2022 1:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Lee,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/20/2022 4:37 PM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> > > > > > On 6/20/2022 1:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 6/17/2022 2:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2022, Satya Priya wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Use i2c_new_dummy_device() to register pm8008-regulator
> > > > > > > > > > client present at a different address space, instead of
> > > > > > > > > > defining a separate DT node. This avoids calling the probe
> > > > > > > > > > twice for the same chip, once for each client pm8008-infra
> > > > > > > > > > and pm8008-regulator.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As a part of this define pm8008_regmap_init() to do regmap
> > > > > > > > > > init for both the clients and define pm8008_get_regmap() to
> > > > > > > > > > pass the regmap to the regulator driver.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > Changes in V15:
> > > > > > > > > > - None.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Changes in V14:
> > > > > > > > > > - None.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Changes in V13:
> > > > > > > > > > - None.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c | 34
> > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > > > > > include/linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > > > > > > > index 569ffd50..55e2a8e 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h>
> > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ enum {
> > > > > > > > > > struct pm8008_data {
> > > > > > > > > > struct device *dev;
> > > > > > > > > > + struct regmap *regulators_regmap;
> > > > > > > > > > int irq;
> > > > > > > > > > struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -150,6 +152,12 @@ static struct regmap_config
> > > > > > > > > > qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg = {
> > > > > > > > > > .max_register = 0xFFFF,
> > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > +struct regmap *pm8008_get_regmap(const struct pm8008_data *chip)
> > > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > > + return chip->regulators_regmap;
> > > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm8008_get_regmap);
> > > > > > > > > Seems like abstraction for the sake of abstraction.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why not do the dereference inside the regulator driver?
> > > > > > > > To derefer this in the regulator driver, we need to have the
> > > > > > > > pm8008_data
> > > > > > > > struct definition in the qcom_pm8008 header file.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think it doesn't look great to have only that structure in
> > > > > > > > header and all
> > > > > > > > other structs and enum in the mfd driver.
> > > > > > > Then why pass 'pm8008_data' at all?
> > > > > > There is one more option, instead of passing the pm8008_data, we could
> > > > > > pass the pdev->dev.parent and get the pm8008 chip data directly in the
> > > > > > pm8008_get_regmap() like below
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct regmap *pm8008_get_regmap(const struct device *dev)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > const struct pm8008_data *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return chip->regulators_regmap;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm8008_get_regmap);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > By doing this we can avoid having declaration of pm8008_data also in the
> > > > > > header. Please let me know if this looks good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Could you please confirm on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > > > What's preventing you from passing 'regmap'?
> > > > > > I didn't get what you meant here, could you please elaborate a bit?
> > > > Ah yes. I authored you a patch, but became distracted. Here:
> > > >
> > > > -----8<--------------------8<-------
> > > >
> > > > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > mfd: pm8008: Remove driver data structure pm8008_data
> > > > Maintaining a local driver data structure that is never shared
> > > > outside of the core device is an unnecessary complexity. Half of the
> > > > attributes were not used outside of a single function, one of which
> > > > was not used at all. The remaining 2 are generic and can be passed
> > > > around as required.
> > >
> > > Okay, but we still need to store the regulators_regmap, which is required in
> > > the pm8008 regulator driver. Could we use a global variable for it?
> > Look down ...
> >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > index c472d7f8103c4..4b8ff947762f2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > @@ -54,13 +54,6 @@ enum {
> > > > #define PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(paddr) (paddr - PM8008_PERIPH_0_BASE)
> > > > -struct pm8008_data {
> > > > - struct device *dev;
> > > > - struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > - int irq;
> > > > - struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > > static unsigned int p0_offs[] = {PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(PM8008_PERIPH_0_BASE)};
> > > > static unsigned int p1_offs[] = {PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(PM8008_PERIPH_1_BASE)};
> > > > static unsigned int p2_offs[] = {PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(PM8008_PERIPH_2_BASE)};
> > > > @@ -150,7 +143,7 @@ static struct regmap_config qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg = {
> > > > .max_register = 0xFFFF,
> > > > };
> > > > -static int pm8008_init(struct pm8008_data *chip)
> > > > +static int pm8008_init(struct regmap *regmap)
> > > > {
> > > > int rc;
> > > > @@ -160,34 +153,31 @@ static int pm8008_init(struct pm8008_data *chip)
> > > > * This is required to enable the writing of TYPE registers in
> > > > * regmap_irq_sync_unlock().
> > > > */
> > > > - rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > > > - (PM8008_TEMP_ALARM_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET),
> > > > - BIT(0));
> > > > + rc = regmap_write(regmap, (PM8008_TEMP_ALARM_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > > > if (rc)
> > > > return rc;
> > > > /* Do the same for GPIO1 and GPIO2 peripherals */
> > > > - rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > > > - (PM8008_GPIO1_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > > > + rc = regmap_write(regmap, (PM8008_GPIO1_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > > > if (rc)
> > > > return rc;
> > > > - rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > > > - (PM8008_GPIO2_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > > > + rc = regmap_write(regmap, (PM8008_GPIO2_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > > > return rc;
> > > > }
> > > > -static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct pm8008_data *chip,
> > > > +static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct device *dev,
> > > > + struct regmap *regmap,
> > > > int client_irq)
> > > > {
> > > > int rc, i;
> > > > struct regmap_irq_type *type;
> > > > struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > > > - rc = pm8008_init(chip);
> > > > + rc = pm8008_init(regmap);
> > > > if (rc) {
> > > > - dev_err(chip->dev, "Init failed: %d\n", rc);
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "Init failed: %d\n", rc);
> > > > return rc;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -207,10 +197,10 @@ static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct pm8008_data *chip,
> > > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > > > }
> > > > - rc = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(chip->dev, chip->regmap, client_irq,
> > > > + rc = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(dev, regmap, client_irq,
> > > > IRQF_SHARED, 0, &pm8008_irq_chip, &irq_data);
> > > > if (rc) {
> > > > - dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add IRQ chip: %d\n", rc);
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add IRQ chip: %d\n", rc);
> > > > return rc;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -220,26 +210,23 @@ static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct pm8008_data *chip,
> > > > static int pm8008_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > {
> > > > int rc;
> > > > - struct pm8008_data *chip;
> > > > -
> > > > - chip = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > - if (!chip)
> > > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > > + struct device *dev;
> > > > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > - chip->dev = &client->dev;
> > > > - chip->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg);
> > > > - if (!chip->regmap)
> > > > + dev = &client->dev;
> > > > + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg);
> > > > + if (!regmap)
> > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > > - i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
> > > > + i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > Here ^
>
>
> I have added a dummy device and set the client data by passing regmap, see
> below:
>
> + regulators_client = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter,
> client->addr + 1);
> + if (IS_ERR(regulators_client)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't attach client\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(regulators_client);
> + }
> +
> + regulators_regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(regulators_client,
> &qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg[1]);
> + if (!regmap)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, regulators_regmap);
>
> Now if i try to get this regmap from regulator driver by doing
>
> struct regmap *regmap = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>
> it still gets me the regmap of pm8008@8 device and not the regulator device
> regmap (0x9). Not sure if I'm missing something here.
So you need to pass 2 regmap pointers?
If you need to pass more than one item to the child devices, you do
need to use a struct for that.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
