On 27-06-22, 13:50, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 04:33:40PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > In the example, alone compatible "qcom,qcs404" is not correct. Add > > proper board compatibles for QCS404 Evaluation Board. > > > > Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Can be picked up independently, although the issue reported by Rob was > > caused by: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqKXDs=QHKob2Xy6vAFZfnkM9ggfmqf9TNA1hv8TScTmgQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Best to go in that tree unless it's going to take weeks... Lemme know Krzysztof about the timing, I am going to send a pull request for cpufreq fixes very soon, so I can take it as well if you want. > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.yaml | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> -- viresh
