On 6/25/22 7:45 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
* If you want to try to do something like this, it should be in a separate patch, probably at the end of the series. Then if people all love it then it can be applied and if people don't like it then the series can simply be applied without it.
Right now I don't see *any* device tree files for *any* architecture using #ifdef guards. So introducing them and selling them seems like more than I want to take on right now, especially because I assume they've already been proposed before (given that they are such a common idiom in C/C++). So in v14 I have just removed the #ifdef guards.
