> > I'll wait for a final Ack from Krzysztof before applying this. > > > A few more details I noticed: > > > > +/ { > > + compatible = "sunplus,sp7021"; > > + model = "Sunplus SP7021"; > > + > > + aliases { > > + serial0 = &uart0; > > + serial1 = &uart1; > > + serial2 = &uart2; > > + serial3 = &uart3; > > + serial4 = &uart4; > > + }; > > Some of these are disabled, presumably because they are not > actually connected on all boards. Better move the aliases to the .dts file > and only list the ports that are in fact used, using the numbering that > matches the labels on the board, not the numbers inside of the SoC > > > + > > + soc { > > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges; > > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > > + > > + intc: interrupt-controller@9c000780 { > > + compatible = "sunplus,sp7021-intc"; > > + reg = <0x9c000780 0x80>, <0x9c000a80 0x80>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + }; > > All child nodes below /soc have registers in the 0x9c000000 range. I would > suggest you use a matching 'ranges' property to translate these into a > zero-based > address like > > /soc { > ranges = <0 0x9c000000 0x10000>; > > interrupt-controller@780 { > reg = <0x780 0x80>, <0xa80 0x80>; > ... > }; > }; > > > + clkc: clock-controller@9c000004 { > > + compatible = "sunplus,sp7021-clkc"; > > + reg = <0x9c000004 0x28>, > > + <0x9c000200 0x44>, > > + <0x9c000268 0x04>; > > + clocks = <&extclk>; > > + #clock-cells = <1>; > > + }; > > + > > + rstc: reset@9c000054 { > > + compatible = "sunplus,sp7021-reset"; > > + reg = <0x9c000054 0x28>; > > + #reset-cells = <1>; > > + }; > > > Maybe sort the nodes by address, or possibly by name. > > Arnd Thanks for your comments, I'll fix these in next patch.