On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:48:43 -0700 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > I have seen a mixed set of the convention for dts patches. They are following > > both routes i.e device tree or subsystem repos provided acked from device > > tree maintainer. If there is preference for device tree repo then I can drop > > net-next from subject prefix and resend it for the dt repo. > > If you got Ack from Devicetree bindings maintainer (Rob Herring or me), > then feel free to take it via net-next. I think, it is actually > preferred, unless this is some fix which needs to go via DT (Rob's) tree. > > If you don't have these acks, then better don't take it :) unless it's > really waiting too long on the lists. I hope it's not that case. GTK, thanks. I'm also often confused by the correct tree for DT patches. I'll revive the patch in PW and apply it later today.
