Hello,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 04:37:51PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 16:04, Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static int dlpc3433_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > + struct dlpc *dlpc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > +
> > + drm_bridge_remove(&dlpc->bridge);
> > + of_node_put(dlpc->host_node);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > + [...]
> > +static struct i2c_driver dlpc3433_driver = {
> > + .probe_new = dlpc3433_probe,
> > + .remove = dlpc3433_remove,
> > + .id_table = dlpc3433_id,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "ti-dlpc3433",
> > + .of_match_table = dlpc3433_match_table,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +module_i2c_driver(dlpc3433_driver);
>
> Applied to drm-misc-next.
just a quick note that there is an easy conflict between this patch and
my effort to make i2c remove callbacks return void. I intend to post my
series on top of v5.20-rc1, so if this patch goes in before, everything
is fine.
See
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20220609091018.q52fhowlsdbdkct5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
for some more details.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
