On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 07:06PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 06:18 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 04:01PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Add missing reference for ADC node.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> >> index 772381fe07bb..fc90f47f9c03 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> >> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
> >> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> >> ranges;
> >>
> >> - adc@f8007100 {
> >> + adc: adc@f8007100 {
> > I think we enumerated all labels. I.e. 'adc0' is probably better.
>
> I was thinking about it and the reason I didn't use that adc0 was
> that it is unique and it is just one in PS. Maybe there could be another adc in PL
> but it will be probably automated not to use adc key world.
> For PL part names was depending on user description.
>
> Anyway logic was not to use enumerated label for unique IPs.
As you said yourself, due to having/being an FPGA and also the
extensibility of the platform via buses (including PCIe), I
would not consider any IP to be unique.
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
