On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 03:44:07 PM Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 09/22/2014 05:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, September 19, 2014 11:48:49 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> Hi Ulf, > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:27:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >>> Changes in v5: > >>> - Converted dev_pm_domain_detach() to a void function > >>> - Added a ->detach() callback to the PM domain struct, invoked from the > >>> dev_pm_domain_detach(). > >>> - Make ACPI and genpd both assign the ->detach() callback at successfull > >>> attachment. > >>> - The above changes made it possible to make acpi_pm_domain_detach() to > >>> be static, added a separate patch for that. > >> > >> Thank you for making these changes. For the series: > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > I've queued up this patchset for 3.18 (I fixed up the two minor issues pointed > > to by Geert in the process). > > > > Could you point me on branch where I can find these patches? > Also, are there any chances to have these patches in next/linux-next.git, > so they will become available for testing and re-using? It is in the bleeding-edge branch of the linux-pm.git tree at the moment, which is rebased quite often, but you can use it for testing. It should appear in linux-next tomorrow. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
