Hi,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 11:39:40AM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> SAMA7G5 reset controller has 5 extra lines that goes to different devices
> (3 lines to USB PHYs, 1 line to DDR controller, 1 line to DDR PHY
> controller). These reset lines could be requested by different controller
> drivers (e.g. USB PHY driver) and these controllers' drivers could
> assert/deassert these lines when necessary. Thus add support for
> reset_controller_dev which brings this functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> index 1b2aca3f490d..e25d8d38a2f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> @@ -17,10 +17,13 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/reboot.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>
> #include <soc/at91/at91sam9_ddrsdr.h>
> #include <soc/at91/at91sam9_sdramc.h>
>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sama7g5-reset.h>
> +
> #define AT91_RSTC_CR 0x00 /* Reset Controller Control Register */
> #define AT91_RSTC_PROCRST BIT(0) /* Processor Reset */
> #define AT91_RSTC_PERRST BIT(2) /* Peripheral Reset */
> @@ -65,7 +68,10 @@ enum reset_type {
> * struct at91_reset - AT91 reset specific data structure
> * @rstc_base: base address for system reset
> * @ramc_base: array with base addresses of RAM controllers
> + * @dev_base: base address for devices reset
> * @sclk: slow clock
> + * @rcdev: reset controller device
> + * @lock: lock for devices reset register access
> * @nb: reset notifier block
> * @args: SoC specific system reset arguments
> * @ramc_lpr: SDRAM Controller Low Power Register
> @@ -73,12 +79,17 @@ enum reset_type {
> struct at91_reset {
> void __iomem *rstc_base;
> void __iomem *ramc_base[2];
> + void __iomem *dev_base;
> struct clk *sclk;
> + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> struct notifier_block nb;
> u32 args;
> u32 ramc_lpr;
> };
>
> +#define to_at91_reset(r) container_of(r, struct at91_reset, rcdev)
> +
> /**
> * struct at91_reset_data - AT91 reset data
> * @reset_args: SoC specific system reset arguments
> @@ -216,6 +227,87 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_reset_of_match[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match);
>
> +static int at91_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id, bool assert)
> +{
> + struct at91_reset *reset = to_at91_reset(rcdev);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&reset->lock, flags);
> + val = readl_relaxed(reset->dev_base);
> + if (assert)
> + val |= BIT(id);
> + else
> + val &= ~BIT(id);
> + writel_relaxed(val, reset->dev_base);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&reset->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int at91_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + return at91_reset_update(rcdev, id, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int at91_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + return at91_reset_update(rcdev, id, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int at91_reset_dev_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct at91_reset *reset = to_at91_reset(rcdev);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(reset->dev_base);
> +
> + return !!(val & BIT(id));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct reset_control_ops at91_reset_ops = {
> + .assert = at91_reset_assert,
> + .deassert = at91_reset_deassert,
> + .status = at91_reset_dev_status,
> +};
> +
> +static int at91_reset_of_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
> +{
> + if (reset_spec->args[0] < SAMA7G5_RESET_USB_PHY1 ||
> + reset_spec->args[0] > SAMA7G5_RESET_USB_PHY3)
> + return -EINVAL;
Can you move the min/max info to the devce info struct, so that
this stays as generic as the name suggests (and is prepared for
future devices)?
-- Sebastian
> + return reset_spec->args[0];
> +}
> +
> +static int at91_rcdev_init(struct at91_reset *reset,
> + const struct at91_reset_data *data,
> + struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + if (!data->n_device_reset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + reset->dev_base = devm_of_iomap(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.of_node, 1,
> + NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(reset->dev_base))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&reset->lock);
> + reset->rcdev.ops = &at91_reset_ops;
> + reset->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + reset->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + reset->rcdev.nr_resets = data->n_device_reset;
> + reset->rcdev.of_reset_n_cells = 1;
> + reset->rcdev.of_xlate = at91_reset_of_xlate;
> +
> + return devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &reset->rcdev);
> +}
> +
> static int __init at91_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> @@ -269,6 +361,10 @@ static int __init at91_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, reset);
>
> + ret = at91_rcdev_init(reset, data, pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto disable_clk;
> +
> if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "microchip,sam9x60-rstc")) {
> u32 val = readl(reset->rstc_base + AT91_RSTC_MR);
>
> @@ -277,14 +373,16 @@ static int __init at91_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> ret = register_restart_handler(&reset->nb);
> - if (ret) {
> - clk_disable_unprepare(reset->sclk);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + goto disable_clk;
>
> at91_reset_status(pdev, reset->rstc_base);
>
> return 0;
> +
> +disable_clk:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(reset->sclk);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int __exit at91_reset_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
