On 06/08, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Florian, > > On 6/8/22 11:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 6/3/2022 11:26 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> This is a follow up from my v4 patchset. The power management pieces have > >> been split out to a separate independent set of patches by Stefan [1]. This > >> version 5 of the DRM patches are independent and given the V3D driver has > >> been upstream for some time the two patches to enable it in defconfigs can > >> be taken at anytime independent of the enablement for the Raspberry Pi 4. > >> > >> I've tested this using mesa 22.0.x and Wayland/Gnome on Fedora 36, it's > >> more or less stable with basic testing. > >> > >> Changes since v5: > >> - Update the DT compatible to match the others that were updated > >> - Adjust the Kconfig help text > >> - Add review tags > >> > >> Changes since v4: > >> - Fixes for device tree and bindings > >> - Split out the power management changes into an independent set > >> - Rebase to 5.18 > >> - Individual changes in patches > >> > >> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg980342.html > > > > I can take the last 3 patches through the Broadcom ARM SoC pull request, > > but the first three should probably go via the DRM tree unless you want > > me to merge them all? > > I can merge the first 3 patches through the drm-misc tree. Can I get > an ack from you for those ? > > The changes are independent so there's no need for an immutable branch > or any kind of cross tree coordination. Hi Javier, I'm not sure if you're suggesting here to apply the entire series as it is now. I'm not able to have a functional kernel from arm defconfig, only for arm64. I'd like to have this issue clarified before merge this serie. I tried multi_v7_defconfig on raspbian 32-bits and got a kernel panic. Things work better when using downstream bcm2711_defconfig. If you have an idea of what is going on, please, let me know. I can try again and I'll be okay on merging it. Otherwise, let's wait for more inputs to have a better picture of the situation. Thanks, Melissa > > -- > Best regards, > > Javier Martinez Canillas > Linux Engineering > Red Hat >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
