Hi all,
On 6/8/22 14:19, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2022, 14:07:33 CEST schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
>> Hey Michael,
>>
>> On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 14:00 +0200, Michael Riesch wrote:
>>>
>>>> + aliases {
>>>> + ethernet0 = &gmac;
>>>> + mmc0 = &emmc;
>>>> + mmc1 = &sdmmc;
>>>
>>> Sure? emmc is at address ff49000 which is larger than sdmmc's address
>>> ff480000. I believe the aliases should be sorted w.r.t. addresses.
>>
>> Do you have a reference about this sorting requirement?
No, not really. I did have the impression that such a convention existed...
> I do believe we used that mmcx -> *mmc-device sorted by address
> when the aliases still were in the main soc dtsi. Simply because one
> couldn't really know what was available on a specific board
> (no emmc for example).
... and this seems to be the case indeed...
> I guess now on a per-board level we could actually do that more relaxed
> and let that be the decision of the board submitter ;-) .
... but apparently the convention is not that crucial anymore :-) Just
wanted to point it out.
>> Also do you mean that mmc0 should be &sdmmc *or* that the aliases
>> should have mmc1 listed first.
FTR, I would have suggested
mmc0 = &sdmmc;
mmc1 = &emmc;
according to said convention, but then I would also take a look on
whatever any other rk3308 boards do and aim to be in sync...
>> For reference the reason is that mmc0 is emmc is because it seems more
>> logical to have the builtin devices come first (e.g. as mmcblk0)
... unless there is a good reason not to. You be the judge of that ;-)
Best regards,
Michael
>> [...]
