Hi Quentin/Jacopo,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 06:51:36PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 05:33:35PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The sensor has 2592*1944 active pixels, surrounded by 16 active dummy
> > pixels and there are an additional 24 black rows "at the bottom".
> >
> > [2624]
> > +-----+------------------+-----+
> > | | 16 dummy | |
> > +-----+------------------+-----+
> > | | | |
> > | | [2592] | |
> > | | | |
> > |16 | valid | 16 |[2000]
> > |dummy| |dummy|
> > | | [1944]| |
> > | | | |
> > +-----+------------------+-----+
> > | | 16 dummy | |
> > +-----+------------------+-----+
> > | | 24 black lines | |
> > +-----+------------------+-----+
> >
> > The top-left coordinate is gotten from the registers specified in the
> > modes which are identical for both currently supported modes.
> >
> > There are currently two modes supported by this driver: 2592*1944 and
> > 1296*972. The second mode is obtained thanks to subsampling while
> > keeping the same field of view (FoV). No cropping involved, hence the
> > harcoded values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > v6:
> > - explicit a bit more the commit log around subsampling for lower
> > resolution modes,
> > - (again) fixed reporting for V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_* thanks to Jacopo's help,
> >
> > v4:
> > - explicit a bit more the commit log,
> > - added drawing in the commit log,
> > - fixed reporting for V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_* thanks to Jacopo's help,
> >
> > added in v3
> >
> > drivers/media/i2c/ov5675.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5675.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5675.c
> > index 80840ad7bbb0..2230ff47ef49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5675.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5675.c
> > @@ -1121,6 +1121,26 @@ static int ov5675_get_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int ov5675_get_selection(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_selection *sel)
> > +{
> > + if (sel->which != V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + switch (sel->target) {
> > + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP:
> > + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_BOUNDS:
>
> Seem like we have trouble understanding each other, or better, I have
> troubles explaining myself most probably :)
>
> If the dummy/black area is readable, this should just be (0, 0, 2624,
> 2000) like it was in your previous version. What has changed that I
> have missed ?
Taking as reference drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c and others,
seems ok what Quentin have done from my side.
Just one thing: maybe is better to avoid magic numbers with more
explicit defines like:
+ case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_DEFAULT:
+ sel->r.top = OV5675_ACTIVE_START_TOP;
+ sel->r.left = OV5693_ACTIVE_START_LEFT;
+ sel->r.width = OV5693_ACTIVE_WIDTH;
+ sel->r.height = OV5693_ACTIVE_HEIGHT;
What do you think about?
Thanks,
Tommaso
>
> Thanks
> j
>
>
> > + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_DEFAULT:
> > + sel->r.top = 16;
> > + sel->r.left = 16;
> > + sel->r.width = 2592;
> > + sel->r.height = 1944;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int ov5675_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> > struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> > @@ -1170,6 +1190,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops ov5675_video_ops = {
> > static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops ov5675_pad_ops = {
> > .set_fmt = ov5675_set_format,
> > .get_fmt = ov5675_get_format,
> > + .get_selection = ov5675_get_selection,
> > .enum_mbus_code = ov5675_enum_mbus_code,
> > .enum_frame_size = ov5675_enum_frame_size,
> > };
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.amarulasolutions.com
