Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,flexcom: Convert to json-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/06/2022 08:55, Kavyasree.Kotagiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> Convert the Atmel flexcom device tree bindings to json schema.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml           | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt | 63 ------------
>>>>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml
>>>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-
>>> flexcom.txt
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..221bd840b49e
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>> +---
>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml#
>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +title: Device tree bindings for Atmel Flexcom (Flexible Serial
>>> Communication Unit)
>>>
>>> There was a v2 of the same patch to which already commented. Now you
>>> send the same patch, without comments applied as v1. This does not make
>>> any sense.
>>>
>>> Please version your patches correctly and do not ignore received feedback.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> FYI, lan966x flexcom chip-select driver support is moved to atmel-flexcom.c
>> rather than
>> implementing a new mux driver. So, I sent new version now with driver
>> changes in drives/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
>> I once again gone through your v2 comments. I missed this comment
>> "s/Device tree bindings//".
>> Except that I addressed remaining all other comments for dt-bindings
>> patches.
>>>
> Hi,
> 
> Please let me know what you mean by " s/Device tree bindings//" comment?

s/X/Y/ is search and replace X with Y, so here, please remove the
"Device tree bindings" words.



Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux