On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sunday, September 14, 2014 06:59:20 PM Tomasz Figa wrote: > > [dropping my old @samsung.com address] > > > > On 11.09.2014 10:57, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > >> On 09/05/2014 05:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > >>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > >>>>>>> This patch should be ready to go too, is it ok if I split the series > > >>>>>>> in arm64 arch specific patches (will ask Catalin to pull) and CPUidle ones > > >>>>>>> (inclusive of DT bindings and !!this patch!!) and send two separate pull > > >>>>>>> requests ? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> If Daniel/Rafael don't have any objection, I can take the whole series > > >>>>>> through the arm64 tree (it seems that patches have been already acked by > > >>>>>> Daniel). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks a lot Catalin. Since this one is a brand new CPUidle driver and it > > >>>>> follows a different pattern from arm legacy drivers I would like to get > > >>>>> Daniel's ack on this patch too before pushing it. For the records I have > > >>>>> just added two pr_err to signal driver probing error, ultraminor changes > > >>>>> that do not justify a repost. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If Samsung guys do not manifest themselves I would drop patch 8 from > > >>>>> the series till it gets tested and its patch dependency queued too. > > >>>> > > >>>> The last patch also has a dependency, as you mentioned to Daniel. I think > > >>>> we can certainly merge the arm64 parts, and if Daniel doesn't object, then > > >>>> we can take the driver stuff too but leaving the exynos bits out (i.e. drop > > >>>> the last patch). > > >>>> > > >>>> Anyway, if you could repost with the acks you've collected and rearrange it > > >>>> so the arm64 patches are first in the series, that would be great. > > >>> > > >>> I can repost it with the acks and rearrange the patches, but for the > > >>> pull request I have to know what code can be merged, since there are > > >>> some arm64 patches (PSCI and CPUidle arm64 back-end) that are strictly > > >>> tied to the arm64 CPUidle driver, so I *have* to know if the arm64 > > >>> CPUidle driver (this patch) can get merged and that requires an ack. > > >>> > > >>> If I do not hear from Samsung guys I will drop patch 8. > > >> > > >> Well I would prefer to have this patch merged (Cc'ing Tomasz). > > > > > > Ok, but: > > > > > > a) I only compile tested it > > > b) There is a dts patch dependency for patch 8 to apply cleanly and it > > > hasn't been acked (I can't really do it since I can't test it) > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/274179.html > > > > > > So, what should we do ? Tomasz ? > > > > Sorry for late reply. I don't work for Samsung anymore so I don't focus > > that much on areas other than I still maintain. > > > > As for b) I believe all my patches have been already merged and now > > we're just waiting for Kukjin to apply Bart's patch (although it's been > > sitting on the ML since July, so probably needs rebasing). > > > > About the patch 8 alone, somebody would have to test it. Maybe Bart or > > Krzysztof could find some time to look at this? Other than that, I'm not > > quite sure about entry latency you specified. It would look like > > entering the state takes longer time than leaving, which I believe is > > not the case. However I can't find any place in the code which would use > > entry latency, so it might not be that important for now. > > I tested this patch series on both Exynos4210 (Origen board) and Exynos5250 > (Arndale board). On Exynos4210 AFTR cpuidle mode is still working fine > with the patch series applied. On Exynos5250 AFTR is not working but it is > an upstream problem (same happens with v3.17-rc4). > > Lorenzo, you can add > > Tested-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > to the Exynos patch (patch #8). Thanks a lot, that's great. I hope Daniel can add the tag and get this merged. Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
