Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:39:26 +0200 от Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> > +* 74XX MMIO GPIO driver
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: Should contain one of the following:
> > + "ti,74ahc1g125": for 74AHC1G125 (1-bit Input),
> > + "ti,74auc1g174": for 74AUC1G74 (1-bit Output),
> > + "ti,74lvc2g125": for 74LVC2G125 (2-bit Input),
> > + "ti,74hc74": for 74HC74 (2-bit Output),
> > + "ti,74hc125": for 74HC125 (4-bit Input),
> > + "ti,74hc175": for 74HC175 (4-bit Output),
> > + "ti,74hc365": for 74HC365 (6-bit Input),
> > + "ti,74hc174": for 74HC174 (6-bit Output),
> > + "ti,74hc244": for 74HC244 (8-bit Input),
> > + "ti,74hc273": for 74HC273 (8-bit Output),
> > + "ti,74ac1624": for 74AC1624 (16-bit Input),
> > + "ti,74ac16374": for 74AC16374 (16-bit Output).
>
> As the actual implementation technology doesn't matter, I think you
> should use the base name where appropriate.
> E.g. "ti,7474" instead of "ti,74hc74".
Make sense.
Linus, what you think overall about this driver?
---
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
