On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 08:37:53PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote: > > Qualcomm has given permission for all the dt-bindings to be dual > > licensed. All of the Linaro authored bindings are easy to change, in > > terms of the permissions & copyrights, so they've been bundled in this > > commit. > > > > Additionally clean up the syntax of some of the copyright statements. > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > There are more Qcom bindings that should have the license updated > > to GPL2+BSD, but since they haven't been authored or copyrighted > > by Linaro, I think I'll have to hunt down the authors individually. > > > > include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8998.h | 2 +- > > include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h | 2 +- > > include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h | 6 ++++-- > > > > At least these 3 have contributors outside Qualcomm and Linaro. > Doesn't this mean you would still need to contact all of them > and see if they are fine with relicensing their contribution? Yes. Though I think you could draw the line at some number of lines. This is what I use to get # of lines by email: git blame -e include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h | sed -e 's/.*<\(.*\)>.*/\1/' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > I don't want to make this more complicated than necessary, but it's > probably better to be careful when it comes to licensing stuff... > > (Although personally I think it feels a bit weird to discuss copyright > for a bunch of "numbered names"...) Indeed. Rob
