I've sent this DT for early feedback. I've commented below on the parts
I'm unsure about, and would appreciate any feedback.
On 29/5/22 13:17, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
+ cluster1_opp_ppp: opp-table1b {
I don't know which OPP should be used.
Per
https://gitlab.com/pine64-org/linux/-/merge_requests/36/diffs?commit_id=dcf78ea8ad6f0b1c6e3279d8d752ca68d6d05756,
using the regular RK3399 OPP table exceeds operating conditions.
Perhaps this should depend on an OPP for RK3399-T (which would need to
be added, as the linked merge request proposes).
+ // Per "TYPE-C", page 23.
+ fusb0: typec-portc@22 {
+ compatible = "fcs,fusb302";
+ reg = <0x22>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
+ interrupts = <RK_PA2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&fusb0_int>;
+ vbus-supply = <&vcc5v0_typec>;
This is the node many PinePhone Pro users have been using for >1 month,
but I don't understand the USB subsystem well enough yet to understand
the node.
