On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 12:23 +0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2022-05-19 20:10:35) > > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:58 AM Rex-BC Chen < > > rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Stephen, > > > > > > this patch will have conflict with Matthias's commit branch for > > > include/dt-bindings/reset/mt8192-resets.h. > > > > > > It's on linux-next. > > > > > > I have fix it in this version, but I think there will be a merge > > > conflict if you pick my series in this run. > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/include/dt-bindings/reset/mt8192-resets.h?h=next-20220519&id=19c66219e4d5b813ebbd28621cfe9c450659ded7__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xFfRxOWRAvhQMzoKxqRu8xFsMZLpVZEoK0WZBKeMOoeRGBjKphSL2tox-8zWlRwytjtEImTo1VB1f38wwj8XSlyKIw$ > > > > > > > The commit in question is in Matthias's v5.18-next/dts64 branch, > > which also > > has the v5.18-next-dts64 tag. The PR for this tag was already > > picked up > > by the soc maintainers, so I guess we could consider it stable. > > > > Matthias, what do you think? Give an ack for the patch to go > > through the > > clk tree with the tag merged in as dependency? There's a compile > > time > > dependency between this and the next patch so we can't just split > > them > > into different trees. > > > > It's pretty late to land something that has cross tree dependencies > like > that so I guess we'll just take up this patch series after the merge > window closes. Hello Stephen, Thanks for your big help! I will send v8 to modify comments from Nícolas. BRs, Rex
