On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/20/2014 08:06 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> Currently, Armada XP PCIe nodes are numbered pcie@<N>,0 with N just >> incrementing. To reflect port/lane relationship, rename the nodes >> to pcie@<port>,<lane>. While at it, add node aliases to each of pcie >> controller and port nodes and get rid of now redundant port/lane >> comments. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > After thinking a while about the current numbering scheme, I have to > admit that it is correct. The @numbers represent assigned-address of > the pcie port and this what it is right now. > > If there are no more comments, I'll resend the series without messing > with the numbering scheme. If your intention is that these go through my PCI tree, please cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, because I only look at the linux-pci patchwork for things to merge. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
