Hi Angelo, >For MT8195... and 92, 83, 73... and others from the same era, being them for >chromebooks, iot, smartphones and whatever else... yeah you're totally right. > >The issue starts raising when looking at older SoCs featuring an older bootloader >that does have a kernel size limitation; for example, to make the loader happy on >MT6795, I had to strip the defconfig a lot and keep the Android-style boot.img >smaller than 10MB (that's Image.gz-dtb + ramdisk). I think you have the point :-) I did not consider the older SoCs case you mentioned and there is a real 10MB limit. I'm fine with this. ChenYu, What do you think? thanks, Miles