On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:22AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: >> > Add of_pci_get_domain_nr() to retrieve the PCI domain number >> > of a given device from DT. If the information is not present, >> > the function can be requested to allocate a new domain number. >> >> Is of_pci_get_domain_nr() used somewhere? If the use is in some future >> series, please mention it explicitly. I'm just trying to avoid merging >> unused code. > > It is used in the arm64 specific patch that I have dropped out of my > pull request. After discussions with Catalin I will add the patch back > into the tree that you've pulled from as he is OK with your tree carrying > the whole package. > > I need to ask for some guidance here: for addressing some of your comments > and Rob's I can add more patches in my v11 branch and you can pull them > when you think they are ready. But one of your comments was requesting > splitting a patch into two blocks - one that moves of_pci_range_to_resource() > into drivers/of/address.c and one that fixes it's behaviour - and I don't > know how you would like that handled. Should I revert the original patch > and add the new ones, or should I rebase the whole series into a different > branch that you can pull from? I guess the easiest thing is probably just to send a v12 series. I was hoping we were close enough for me to just hand-integrate minor tweaks into my branch, but I think that will just create more confusion. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
