On 19/05/2022 13:31, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 18/05/2022 22:09, Corentin Labbe wrote: > >>> + regulators: >>> + description: >>> + List of phandle to regulators needed for the PHY > >> I don't understand that... is your PHY defining the regulators or using >> supplies? If it needs a regulator (as a supply), you need to document >> supplies, using existing bindings. > > They're trying to have a generic driver which works with any random PHY > so the binding has no idea what supplies it might need. OK, that makes sense, but then question is why not using existing naming, so "supplies" and "supply-names"? Best regards, Krzysztof
