On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 19:31, Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:42, Konrad Dybcio > <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On 17/05/2022 22:53, Robert Marko wrote: > > > PMP8074 is a companion PMIC for the Qualcomm IPQ8074 WiSoC-s. > > > > > > It features 5 HF-SMPS and 13 LDO regulators. > > > > > > This commit adds support for S3 and S4 HF-SMPS buck regulators of > > > the HFS430 type and LDO11 of the HT_P150 type. > > > S3 is the CPU cluster voltage supply, S4 supplies the UBI32 NPU cores > > > and LDO11 is the SDIO/eMMC I/O voltage regulator required for high speeds. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c | 8 ++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c > > > index 38bbc70241ae..696b088aae40 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c > > > +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c > > > @@ -2137,6 +2137,13 @@ static const struct spmi_regulator_data pms405_regulators[] = { > > > { } > > > }; > > > > > > +static const struct spmi_regulator_data pmp8074_regulators[] = { > > > > Please sort the struct alphabletically. > > Hi, > Will fixup in v3. > > > > > > > > + { "s3", 0x1a00, "vdd_s3"}, > > > + { "s4", 0x1d00, "vdd_s4"}, > > > + { "l11", 0x4a00, "vdd_l10_l11_l12_l13"}, > > > > Are the other regulators somehow not controllable through SPMI? Please > > leave a comment if that's the case. > > No, they are all controllable via SPMI as far as I know. > Though the output table completely leaves out L7, L9, and L10. > L5 and L6 are specified as Ebuck-4 subtypes (0x3d), while L10 is not > listed at all (0x34). Ok, I dug a bit further and L5/6 are HT_P600 and are easily supportable. L10 is an HT_P50 type but it's listed as unused and left disabled, I don't know its supported output voltage range. Regards, Robert > These are not currently supported and I don't have enough information > to support them. > L1, L2, L3, L4, L7, L8, L9, L11, L12, and L13 appear to have their > subtype already supported. > L1, L2, L3, L8, L9 subtype (0x32) > L4 subtype (0x30) > L7, L11, L12, L13 subtype (0x35) > > S3, S4, and L11 are the most important ones. > > > > > > > + { } > > > +}; > > > + > > > static const struct of_device_id qcom_spmi_regulator_match[] = { > > > { .compatible = "qcom,pm8004-regulators", .data = &pm8004_regulators }, > > > { .compatible = "qcom,pm8005-regulators", .data = &pm8005_regulators }, > > > @@ -2150,6 +2157,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_spmi_regulator_match[] = { > > > { .compatible = "qcom,pm660-regulators", .data = &pm660_regulators }, > > > { .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-regulators", .data = &pm660l_regulators }, > > > { .compatible = "qcom,pms405-regulators", .data = &pms405_regulators }, > > > + { .compatible = "qcom,pmp8074-regulators", .data = &pmp8074_regulators }, > > > > Please sort the compatible too. > > Will fixup in v3. > > Regards, > Robert > > > > > > Konrad > > > > > { } > > > }; > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_spmi_regulator_match); > > >