> On Mon, 16 May 2022 18:06:32 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > static int mtk_tx_alloc(struct mtk_eth *eth) > > { > > + const struct mtk_soc_data *soc = eth->soc; > > struct mtk_tx_ring *ring = ð->tx_ring; > > - int i, sz = sizeof(*ring->dma); > > The change would be smaller if you left sz in place. > I guess you have a reason not to? ack, I will do in v3. > > > + struct mtk_tx_dma *txd; > > + int i; > > > > ring->buf = kcalloc(MTK_DMA_SIZE, sizeof(*ring->buf), > > GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!ring->buf) > > goto no_tx_mem; > > > > - ring->dma = dma_alloc_coherent(eth->dma_dev, MTK_DMA_SIZE * sz, > > + ring->dma = dma_alloc_coherent(eth->dma_dev, > > + MTK_DMA_SIZE * soc->txrx.txd_size, > > &ring->phys, GFP_ATOMIC); > > Another GFP nugget. ack I will fix it in v3. Regards, Lorenzo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature