On 17/05/2022 11:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:13 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The patches are independent, so they can be picked up as is (or everything >> through Qualcomm SoC tree). >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> Krzysztof Kozlowski (13): >> dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: document qcom,sm8450-aoss-qmp >> dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,smd-rpm: add power-controller >> dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: add IPQ8074, MSM8994, QCS404 and SM6125 >> dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: fix clock matching >> arm64: dts: qcom: add missing AOSS QMP compatible fallback >> arm64: dts: qcom: correct DWC3 node names and unit addresses >> arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add dedicated qcom,ipq8074-dwc3 compatible >> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: add dedicated qcom,msm8994-dwc3 compatible >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: add dedicated qcom,sm6125-dwc3 compatible >> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: add dedicated qcom,qcs404-dwc3 compatible >> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: add clock-names to DWC3 USB node >> arm64: dts: qcom: align DWC3 USB clocks with DT schema >> arm64: dts: qcom: align DWC3 USB interrupts with DT schema > > Looks like all but the first two were applied to usb-next by Greg, > causing conflicts with the soc/for-next tree. Also this one was not applied: arm64: dts: qcom: add missing AOSS QMP compatible fallback However I did not get any conflict message... The DTS patches should not go via Greg's tree. They are sent together so there will be no warnings from Rob's bot. This is a common practice for dt-binding fixes. Bjorn, Any preference from you? Shall I send missing three patches to you? What about conflicts with Greg's tree? Best regards, Krzysztof
