Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:05 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 13/05/2022 18:59, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > This adds board bindings for boards that are downstream but not quite > > upstream yet. > > > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Use a "description" instead of a comment for each item. > > - Use the marketing name instead of the code name where possible. > > These should be published with the patch adding their upstream DTS/DTSI. > There is no point to list all possible boards in the world from any > downstream source. For upstream there is no particular benefit for such > bindings, for downstream you also said there is no. Joe has been working on upstreaming these boards: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510154406.v5.1.Id769ddc5dbf570ccb511db96da59f97d08f75a9c@changeid/ I think there is little chance that they won't go upstream at this point. However, we're at a time in the merge window where it will be several weeks before anything can land. If Joe were to include this patch as part of his series I suspect it would be much more confusing because it would add an unnecessary dependency between my series and his and make it harder for Bjorn to apply it later. Keeping the patch with my series means that the series can be applied more easily. How about: I'll add a link to his latest posting in my next version. Then, in the future (after these bindings patches have landed) then future boards can go together with their bindings. -DOug
