On 14/05/2022 12:37, Marijn Suijten wrote:
Title copy-paste error: it should read dsi0/dsi0_phy. Can you also
reorder this patch together with the dsi1/dsi1_phy one, and perhaps they
should just be squashed? Otherwise, does a Suggested-by: make sense
here?
Yes, it does. Please excuse me.
- Marijn
On 2022-05-14 02:45:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Follow the typical practice and keep DSI0/DSI0 PHY disabled by default.
They should be enabled in the board DT files. No existing boards use
them at this moment.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
index 240293592ef9..8697d40e9b74 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
@@ -1559,6 +1559,8 @@ dsi0: dsi@c994000 {
phys = <&dsi0_phy>;
phy-names = "dsi";
+ status = "disabled";
+
ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
@@ -1592,6 +1594,7 @@ dsi0_phy: dsi-phy@c994400 {
clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>, <&xo_board>;
clock-names = "iface", "ref";
+ status = "disabled";
};
};
--
2.35.1
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
