On Friday 19 September 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:25AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > PCI_IOBASE is a virtual address. So PCI_IOBASE + res->start is also a > virtual address (only for IORESOURCE_IO). > > Since res->start is normally a *physical* address, I think it would be less > confusing to do something like this: > > vaddr = PCI_IOBASE + res->start; > ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + resource_size(res), ...); > > so we have a hint that the first two ioremap_page_range() parameters are > virtual addresses. It's also confusing that it uses "unsigned long" for > the virtual addresses, when we usually use "void *". But that's out of > scope for this patch. Good idea. I think it will have to be (unsigned long)PCI_IOBASE above then, since ioremap_page_range takes a 'unsigned long' virtual address and PCI_IOBASE should really remain an __iomem pointer. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
