On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 23:12, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 10:45:22PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > > On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 22:08, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:56:01PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > > > > Add dt-binding for the IPQ8074 APSS clock controller which provides > > > > clocks to the CPU cores. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > * Correct subject > > > > --- > > > > include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..df07766b0146 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > > > > > Dual license please. > > > > Hi Rob, > > Krzysztof asked about this in v1, I have derived this off IPQ6018 > > binding which is marked GPL-2.0. > > So, I was not sure if it was appropriate to mark it as GPL/BSD dual license. > > If you say that its not an issue to dual-license, I will gladly do it. > > Technically, you should maintain it, but I don't think 2 defines is > really enough to represent copyrightable work (but IANAL). I also know > that QCom prefers the DT stuff to be dual licensed because they've > raised the issue with me. If that is the case, then I will dual-license it and send in v4 as I am waiting for the code portion to get some comments before resending. Regards, Robert > > Rob
