On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:47:05AM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > Hi Rob > > On 5/9/22 21:16, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, 09 May 2022 15:46:58 +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > > > For "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure" schema, clocks and clock-names entries are now > > > required properties. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > > Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.example.dts:27.33-34 syntax error > > FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:364: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.example.dtb] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > make: *** [Makefile:1401: dt_binding_check] Error 2 > > > > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): > > > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/ > > > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch > > series is generally the most recent rc1. > > > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to > > date: > > > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > > > Please check and re-submit. > > > > I just updated dtschema and yamllint seems to be well installed. I don't see > the see above. I wrote this patch on top of my stm32-next tree. Do I have to > send it directly to arm-soc in order to be merged on top of my latest > pull-request ? That appears to be header related AFAICT. Maybe you have header changes in your tree. The issue this is fixing is in your tree, so it should be applied there. Rob
