Le Mon, 9 May 2022 19:08:13 +0300,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:18:54PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> > Add Renesas RZ/N1 advanced 5 port switch driver. This switch
> > handles 5 ports including 1 CPU management port. A MDIO bus is also
> > exposed by this switch and allows to communicate with PHYs
> > connected to the ports. Each switch port (except for the CPU
> > management ports) is connected to the MII converter.
> >
> > This driver includes basic bridging support, more support will be
> > added later (vlan, etc).
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jean-Pierre Geslin <jean-pierre.geslin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > +static int a5psw_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > + struct dsa_bridge bridge,
> > + bool *tx_fwd_offload,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + struct a5psw *a5psw = ds->priv;
> > +
> > + /* We only support 1 bridge device */
> > + if (a5psw->br_dev && bridge.dev != a5psw->br_dev) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> > + "Forwarding offload supported
> > for a single bridge");
>
> I don't think I saw the dsa_slave_changeupper() patch that avoids
> overwriting the extack when dsa_port_bridge_join() returns
> -EOPNOTSUPP.
Ok, I did not understood that dsa_slave_changeupper() *did* needed to
be modified. I'll do that.
>
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + a5psw->br_dev = bridge.dev;
> > + a5psw_flooding_set_resolution(a5psw, port, true);
> > + a5psw_port_mgmtfwd_set(a5psw, port, false);
> > +
> > + return 0;
>
> By the way, does this switch pass
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/dsa/no_forwarding.sh?
Unfortunately, the board I have only has 2 ports availables and thus, I
can only test one bridge or two separated ports at a time... I *should*
receive a 4 ports one in a near future but that not yet sure.
