On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 07:30:47AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 04/05/2022 à 17:40, Clément Léger a écrit : > > Add function which allows to dynamically allocate and free properties. > > Use this function internally for all code that used the same logic > > (mainly __of_prop_dup()). > > > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/of/dynamic.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > include/linux/of.h | 16 +++++++ > > 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c > > index cd3821a6444f..e8700e509d2e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c > > +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c > > @@ -313,9 +313,7 @@ static void property_list_free(struct property *prop_list) > > > > for (prop = prop_list; prop != NULL; prop = next) { > > next = prop->next; > > - kfree(prop->name); > > - kfree(prop->value); > > - kfree(prop); > > + of_property_free(prop); > > } > > } > > > > @@ -367,48 +365,95 @@ void of_node_release(struct kobject *kobj) > > } > > > > /** > > - * __of_prop_dup - Copy a property dynamically. > > - * @prop: Property to copy > > + * of_property_free - Free a property allocated dynamically. > > + * @prop: Property to be freed > > + */ > > +void of_property_free(const struct property *prop) > > +{ > > + kfree(prop->value); > > + kfree(prop->name); > > + kfree(prop); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_property_free); > > + > > +/** > > + * of_property_alloc - Allocate a property dynamically. > > + * @name: Name of the new property > > + * @value: Value that will be copied into the new property value > > + * @value_len: length of @value to be copied into the new property value > > + * @len: Length of new property value, must be greater than @value_len > > * @allocflags: Allocation flags (typically pass GFP_KERNEL) > > * > > - * Copy a property by dynamically allocating the memory of both the > > + * Create a property by dynamically allocating the memory of both the > > * property structure and the property name & contents. The property's > > * flags have the OF_DYNAMIC bit set so that we can differentiate between > > * dynamically allocated properties and not. > > * > > * Return: The newly allocated property or NULL on out of memory error. > > */ > > -struct property *__of_prop_dup(const struct property *prop, gfp_t allocflags) > > +struct property *of_property_alloc(const char *name, const void *value, > > + int value_len, int len, gfp_t allocflags) > > { > > - struct property *new; > > + int alloc_len = len; > > + struct property *prop; > > + > > + if (len < value_len) > > + return NULL; > > > > - new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), allocflags); > > - if (!new) > > + prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), allocflags); > > + if (!prop) > > return NULL; > > > > + prop->name = kstrdup(name, allocflags); > > + if (!prop->name) > > + goto out_err; > > + > > /* > > - * NOTE: There is no check for zero length value. > > - * In case of a boolean property, this will allocate a value > > - * of zero bytes. We do this to work around the use > > - * of of_get_property() calls on boolean values. > > + * Even if the property has no value, it must be set to a > > + * non-null value since of_get_property() is used to check > > + * some values that might or not have a values (ranges for > > + * instance). Moreover, when the node is released, prop->value > > + * is kfreed so the memory must come from kmalloc. > > */ > > - new->name = kstrdup(prop->name, allocflags); > > - new->value = kmemdup(prop->value, prop->length, allocflags); > > - new->length = prop->length; > > - if (!new->name || !new->value) > > - goto err_free; > > + if (!alloc_len) > > + alloc_len = 1; > > > > - /* mark the property as dynamic */ > > - of_property_set_flag(new, OF_DYNAMIC); > > + prop->value = kzalloc(alloc_len, allocflags); > > + if (!prop->value) > > + goto out_err; > > > > - return new; > > + if (value) > > + memcpy(prop->value, value, value_len); > > Could you use kmemdup() instead of kzalloc+memcpy ? I'd prefer there be 1 alloc for struct property and value instead of 2. And maybe 'name' gets rolled into it too, but that gets a bit more complicated to manage I think. With memcpy, note this series[1]. Rob [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220504014440.3697851-30-keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx/