On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote: > Indeed, I'll simply remove these error message. Should I still return > an error value however ? Seems like I should not to avoid triggering > any error that might confuse the user. The error code will not be propagated to the bridge driver anyway, but will trigger prints in dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work() however. You have to choose between 2 alternatives (a) keep the FDB entry around until it gets removed from all VLANs (b) delete the FDB entry as soon as it gets removed from the first VLAN Both options are going to raise eyebrows. (a) will result in "huh, why did my packet get delivered to this port when the address wasn't in the FDB?", while (b) will result in "huh, why was my packet flooded when the address was in the FDB?" And since (b) is of lower complexity than (a), I'd just silently exit, maybe add a comment explaining why, and hope for the best.
