On Wed, 4 May 2022 15:54:45 +0100 Phil Edworthy wrote: > The RZ/V2M Ethernet is very similar to R-Car Gen3 Ethernet-AVB, though > some small parts are the same as R-Car Gen2. > Other differences are: > * It has separate data (DI), error (Line 1) and management (Line 2) irqs > rather than one irq for all three. > * Instead of using the High-speed peripheral bus clock for gPTP, it has > a separate gPTP reference clock. > > The dts patches depend on v4 of the following patch set: > "Add new Renesas RZ/V2M SoC and Renesas RZ/V2M EVK support" > > Phil Edworthy (9): > clk: renesas: r9a09g011: Add eth clock and reset entries > dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: Document RZ/V2M SoC > ravb: Separate use of GIC reg for PTME from multi_irqs > ravb: Separate handling of irq enable/disable regs into feature > ravb: Support separate Line0 (Desc), Line1 (Err) and Line2 (Mgmt) irqs > ravb: Use separate clock for gPTP > ravb: Add support for RZ/V2M > arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g011: Add ethernet nodes > arm64: dts: renesas: rzv2m evk: Enable ethernet How are you expecting this to be merged? I think you should drop the first (clk) patch from this series so we can apply the series to net-next. And route the clk patch thru Geert's tree separately? Right now patchwork thinks the series is incomplete because it hasn't received patch 1.
