Am Mittwoch, 27. April 2022, 15:36:17 CEST schrieb Nicolas Dufresne:
> Le vendredi 22 avril 2022 à 19:09 +0200, Sebastian Reichel a écrit :
> > From: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add RK3588 PLL support including calculation of PLL parameters
> > for arbitrary frequencies.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [rebase and partially rewrite code]
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 287 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h | 18 +++
> > 2 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > index f7827b3b7fc1..010e47eb51b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/units.h>
> > #include "clk.h"
> >
> > #define PLL_MODE_MASK 0x3
> > @@ -47,6 +48,67 @@ struct rockchip_clk_pll {
> > #define to_rockchip_clk_pll_nb(nb) \
> > container_of(nb, struct rockchip_clk_pll, clk_nb)
> >
> > +static int
> > +rockchip_rk3588_get_pll_settings(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> > + unsigned long fin_hz,
> > + unsigned long fout_hz,
> > + struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate_table)
> > +{
> > + u64 fvco_min = 2250 * HZ_PER_MHZ, fvco_max = 4500 * HZ_PER_MHZ;
> > + u64 fout_min = 37 * HZ_PER_MHZ, fout_max = 4500 * HZ_PER_MHZ;
> > + u32 p, m, s;
> > + u64 fvco, fref, fout, ffrac;
> > +
> > + if (fin_hz == 0 || fout_hz == 0 || fout_hz == fin_hz)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (fout_hz > fout_max || fout_hz < fout_min)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (fin_hz / HZ_PER_MHZ * HZ_PER_MHZ == fin_hz &&
> > + fout_hz / HZ_PER_MHZ * HZ_PER_MHZ == fout_hz) {
> > + for (s = 0; s <= 6; s++) {
> > + fvco = fout_hz << s;
> > + if (fvco < fvco_min || fvco > fvco_max)
> > + continue;
> > + for (p = 2; p <= 4; p++) {
> > + for (m = 64; m <= 1023; m++) {
> > + if (fvco == m * fin_hz / p) {
> > + rate_table->p = p;
> > + rate_table->m = m;
> > + rate_table->s = s;
> > + rate_table->k = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + fout = (fout_hz / HZ_PER_MHZ) * HZ_PER_MHZ;
> > + ffrac = (fout_hz % HZ_PER_MHZ);
> > + for (s = 0; s <= 6; s++) {
> > + fvco = fout << s;
> > + if (fvco < fvco_min || fvco > fvco_max)
> > + continue;
> > + for (p = 1; p <= 4; p++) {
> > + for (m = 64; m <= 1023; m++) {
> > + if (fvco == m * fin_hz / p) {
> > + rate_table->p = p;
> > + rate_table->m = m;
> > + rate_table->s = s;
> > + fref = fin_hz / p;
> > + fout = (ffrac << s) * 65535;
> > + rate_table->k = fout / fref;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rockchip_get_pll_settings(
> > struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate)
> > {
> > @@ -68,6 +130,14 @@ static long rockchip_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate_table = pll->rate_table;
> > int i;
> >
> > + if (pll->type == pll_rk3588 || pll->type == pll_rk3588_core) {
> > + long parent_rate = prate ? *prate : 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ;
> > + struct rockchip_pll_rate_table pll_settings;
> > +
> > + if (rockchip_rk3588_get_pll_settings(pll, parent_rate, drate, &pll_settings) >= 0)
> > + return pll_settings.rate;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I was reading some of previous backlog on why these formula have never been
> mainlines [0]. It looks like so far the statu quo was adopted. But if that was
> to change, I think this implementation is not aligned with the intent. If my
> understanding is right, the rate_table[] (if it exists) should be looked up
> first and the formula use as a fallback.
real life products like the Chromebooks using rk3288 and rk3399 had
a lot of fun with PLL rates (jitter and whatnot) and even had the underlying
parameters of some rates changed (same rate but using different parameters
to achive it) to reduce effects.
When doing this rate-table + dynamic calculation you never really know
which one will be taken I guess. When you hit the exact rate as in the
table you might get an optimized one but when round-rate ends up like 1kHz
above, you would then get a non-optimized calculated one.
So I'm personally really in favor of just sticking with a curated rate-table.
Heiko
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/1470144852-20708-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#19548765
>
> > /* Assumming rate_table is in descending order */
> > for (i = 0; i < pll->rate_count; i++) {
> > if (drate >= rate_table[i].rate)
> > @@ -842,6 +912,212 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3399_pll_clk_ops = {
> > .init = rockchip_rk3399_pll_init,
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * PLL used in RK3588
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON(i) (i * 0x4)
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON0_M_MASK 0x3ff
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON0_M_SHIFT 0
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON1_P_MASK 0x3f
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON1_P_SHIFT 0
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON1_S_MASK 0x7
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON1_S_SHIFT 6
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON2_K_MASK 0xffff
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON2_K_SHIFT 0
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN BIT(13)
> > +#define RK3588_PLLCON6_LOCK_STATUS BIT(15)
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
> > +{
> > + u32 pllcon;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Lock time typical 250, max 500 input clock cycles @24MHz
> > + * So define a very safe maximum of 1000us, meaning 24000 cycles.
> > + */
> > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(6),
> > + pllcon,
> > + pllcon & RK3588_PLLCON6_LOCK_STATUS,
> > + 0, 1000);
> > + if (ret)
> > + pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rockchip_rk3588_pll_get_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> > + struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate)
> > +{
> > + u32 pllcon;
> > +
> > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(0));
> > + rate->m = ((pllcon >> RK3588_PLLCON0_M_SHIFT) & RK3588_PLLCON0_M_MASK);
> > +
> > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1));
> > + rate->p = ((pllcon >> RK3588_PLLCON1_P_SHIFT) & RK3588_PLLCON1_P_MASK);
> > + rate->s = ((pllcon >> RK3588_PLLCON1_S_SHIFT) & RK3588_PLLCON1_S_MASK);
> > +
> > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(2));
> > + rate->k = ((pllcon >> RK3588_PLLCON2_K_SHIFT) & RK3588_PLLCON2_K_MASK);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned long rockchip_rk3588_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long prate)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> > + struct rockchip_pll_rate_table cur;
> > + u64 rate64 = prate, postdiv;
> > +
> > + rockchip_rk3588_pll_get_params(pll, &cur);
> > +
> > + rate64 *= cur.m;
> > + do_div(rate64, cur.p);
> > +
> > + if (cur.k) {
> > + /* fractional mode */
> > + u64 frac_rate64 = prate * cur.k;
> > +
> > + postdiv = cur.p * 65535;
> > + do_div(frac_rate64, postdiv);
> > + rate64 += frac_rate64;
> > + }
> > + rate64 = rate64 >> cur.s;
> > +
> > + return (unsigned long)rate64;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> > + const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate)
> > +{
> > + const struct clk_ops *pll_mux_ops = pll->pll_mux_ops;
> > + struct clk_mux *pll_mux = &pll->pll_mux;
> > + struct rockchip_pll_rate_table cur;
> > + int rate_change_remuxed = 0;
> > + int cur_parent;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + pr_debug("%s: rate settings for %lu p: %d, m: %d, s: %d, k: %d\n",
> > + __func__, rate->rate, rate->p, rate->m, rate->s, rate->k);
> > +
> > + rockchip_rk3588_pll_get_params(pll, &cur);
> > + cur.rate = 0;
> > +
> > + if (pll->type == pll_rk3588) {
> > + cur_parent = pll_mux_ops->get_parent(&pll_mux->hw);
> > + if (cur_parent == PLL_MODE_NORM) {
> > + pll_mux_ops->set_parent(&pll_mux->hw, PLL_MODE_SLOW);
> > + rate_change_remuxed = 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* set pll power down */
> > + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN,
> > + RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(1));
> > +
> > + /* update pll values */
> > + writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->m, RK3588_PLLCON0_M_MASK, RK3588_PLLCON0_M_SHIFT),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(0));
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->p, RK3588_PLLCON1_P_MASK, RK3588_PLLCON1_P_SHIFT) |
> > + HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->s, RK3588_PLLCON1_S_MASK, RK3588_PLLCON1_S_SHIFT),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(1));
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->k, RK3588_PLLCON2_K_MASK, RK3588_PLLCON2_K_SHIFT),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2));
> > +
> > + /* set pll power up */
> > + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1));
> > +
> > + /* wait for the pll to lock */
> > + ret = rockchip_rk3588_pll_wait_lock(pll);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_warn("%s: pll update unsuccessful, trying to restore old params\n",
> > + __func__);
> > + rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_params(pll, &cur);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if ((pll->type == pll_rk3588) && rate_change_remuxed)
> > + pll_mux_ops->set_parent(&pll_mux->hw, PLL_MODE_NORM);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
> > + unsigned long prate)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> > + struct rockchip_pll_rate_table rate;
> > + unsigned long old_rate = rockchip_rk3588_pll_recalc_rate(hw, prate);
> > +
> > + pr_debug("%s: changing %s from %lu to %lu with a parent rate of %lu\n",
> > + __func__, __clk_get_name(hw->clk), old_rate, drate, prate);
> > +
> > + if (rockchip_rk3588_get_pll_settings(pll, prate, drate, &rate) < 0) {
> > + pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__,
> > + drate, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_params(pll, &rate);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> > +
> > + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1));
> > + rockchip_rk3588_pll_wait_lock(pll);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rockchip_rk3588_pll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> > +
> > + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0),
> > + pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> > + u32 pllcon = readl(pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1));
> > +
> > + return !(pllcon & RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_init(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> > +
> > + if (!(pll->flags & ROCKCHIP_PLL_SYNC_RATE))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3588_pll_clk_norate_ops = {
> > + .recalc_rate = rockchip_rk3588_pll_recalc_rate,
> > + .enable = rockchip_rk3588_pll_enable,
> > + .disable = rockchip_rk3588_pll_disable,
> > + .is_enabled = rockchip_rk3588_pll_is_enabled,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3588_pll_clk_ops = {
> > + .recalc_rate = rockchip_rk3588_pll_recalc_rate,
> > + .round_rate = rockchip_pll_round_rate,
> > + .set_rate = rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_rate,
> > + .enable = rockchip_rk3588_pll_enable,
> > + .disable = rockchip_rk3588_pll_disable,
> > + .is_enabled = rockchip_rk3588_pll_is_enabled,
> > + .init = rockchip_rk3588_pll_init,
> > +};
> > +
> > /*
> > * Common registering of pll clocks
> > */
> > @@ -890,7 +1166,8 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_pll(struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx,
> > if (pll_type == pll_rk3036 ||
> > pll_type == pll_rk3066 ||
> > pll_type == pll_rk3328 ||
> > - pll_type == pll_rk3399)
> > + pll_type == pll_rk3399 ||
> > + pll_type == pll_rk3588)
> > pll_mux->flags |= CLK_MUX_HIWORD_MASK;
> >
> > /* the actual muxing is xin24m, pll-output, xin32k */
> > @@ -957,6 +1234,14 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_pll(struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx,
> > else
> > init.ops = &rockchip_rk3399_pll_clk_ops;
> > break;
> > + case pll_rk3588:
> > + case pll_rk3588_core:
> > + if (!pll->rate_table)
> > + init.ops = &rockchip_rk3588_pll_clk_norate_ops;
> > + else
> > + init.ops = &rockchip_rk3588_pll_clk_ops;
> > + init.flags = flags;
> > + break;
> > default:
> > pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n",
> > __func__, name);
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > index 6aece7f07a7d..bf7c8d082fde 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ enum rockchip_pll_type {
> > pll_rk3066,
> > pll_rk3328,
> > pll_rk3399,
> > + pll_rk3588,
> > + pll_rk3588_core,
> > };
> >
> > #define RK3036_PLL_RATE(_rate, _refdiv, _fbdiv, _postdiv1, \
> > @@ -253,6 +255,15 @@ enum rockchip_pll_type {
> > .nb = _nb, \
> > }
> >
> > +#define RK3588_PLL_RATE(_rate, _p, _m, _s, _k) \
> > +{ \
> > + .rate = _rate##U, \
> > + .p = _p, \
> > + .m = _m, \
> > + .s = _s, \
> > + .k = _k, \
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct rockchip_clk_provider - information about clock provider
> > * @reg_base: virtual address for the register base.
> > @@ -288,6 +299,13 @@ struct rockchip_pll_rate_table {
> > unsigned int dsmpd;
> > unsigned int frac;
> > };
> > + struct {
> > + /* for RK3588 */
> > + unsigned int m;
> > + unsigned int p;
> > + unsigned int s;
> > + unsigned int k;
> > + };
> > };
> > };
> >
>
>
