RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8m: correct usb power domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 11:25 PM
> To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> aford173@xxxxxxxxx; tharvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jacky Bai <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8m: correct usb power domain
> 
> Am 29.04.22 um 12:09 schrieb Jun Li:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 5:04 PM
> >> To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> >> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> aford173@xxxxxxxxx; tharvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> Jacky Bai <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8m: correct usb power domain
> >>
> >> Am 29.04.22 um 09:43 schrieb Li Jun:
> >>> pgc_otg1/2 is for each usb phy and pgc_hsiomix is shared by 2 usb
> >>> controllers, so assign those power domains to correct controller and
> >>> phy node, decouple the pgc_otg1/2 from pgc_hsiomix since there is no
> >>> hardware dependency.
> >>>
> >>> Suggested-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the patch!
> >>
> >> In my previous test I probably made some mistake. The second USB
> >> controller was kept enabled by the onboard hub. When I disable the
> >> second port and test the patch with the first port only, resuming
> >> from autosuspend still doesn't work, even when I keep the HSIOMIX as
> >> parent for OTG1/2. So there's probably still something missing...
> >
> > My test was done with both second USB port and PCIE disabled, so while
> > autosuspend of first port, the pgc_hsiomix is off, it works fine on my
> > HW:
> >
> > root@imx8mqevk:~# [   81.021437] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number
> 3
> 
> Are you testing on i.MX8MM/N EVK? Your CLI prompt says imx8mqevk, which seems
> a bit misleading...

I was just using a rootfs for iMX8mq, which doesn't matter.

> 
> On which kernel version are you testing? I'm on 5.18-rc4.

Add linux-next specific files for 20220428

> 
> >
> > root@imx8mqevk:~# cat
> > /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/usb-otg1/current_state
> > on
> > root@imx8mqevk:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/hsiomix/current_state
> > off-0
> > root@imx8mqevk:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/usb-otg2/current_state
> > off-0
> > root@imx8mqevk:~# [  182.196450] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device
> > number 4 using ci_hdrc [  182.356130] usb-storage 1-1:1.0: USB Mass
> > Storage device detected [  182.357632] scsi host0: usb-storage 1-1:1.0
> > [  183.367923] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     SanDisk  Ultra
> 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
> > [  183.370559] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 60062500 512-byte logical blocks:
> > (30.8 GB/28.6 GiB) [  183.372332] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is
> > off [  183.373061] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read
> > cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [  183.384709] sd 0:0:0:0:
> > [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk [  184.207552] EXT4-fs (sda): mounted
> filesystem with ordered data mode. Quota mode: none.
> >
> > root@imx8mqevk:~# ls /sys/bus/platform/devices/*usb* -d
> > /sys/bus/platform/devices/32e40000.usb
> > /sys/bus/platform/devices/32e40200.usbmisc
> > /sys/bus/platform/devices/usbphynop1
> 
> The PCIe nodes, usbotg2, usbphynop2 and usbmisc2 are disabled and devices
> on the autosuspended first port aren't detected:
> 
> root@kontron-mx8mm:~# cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/usb-otg1/current_state
> on
> root@kontron-mx8mm:~# cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/usb-otg2/current_state
> off-0
> root@kontron-mx8mm:~# cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/hsiomix/current_state
> off-0
> 
> root@kontron-mx8mm:~# ls /sys/bus/platform/devices/*usb* -d
> /sys/bus/platform/devices/32e40000.usb
> /sys/bus/platform/devices/32e40200.usbmisc
> /sys/bus/platform/devices/usbphynop1
> 
> >
> > So basically you are saying your first port cannot work even both
> > pgc_otg1 and pgc_hsiomix are on if you disable 2nd port?
> 
> Exactly. I really don't understand it, but as soon as I disable the second
> port the detection of a device on the suspended first port stops working.
> When I force the port on, the device is detected:

Here your intention is force *which* port? 1st port(usbotg1) or the 2nd
port(usbotg2)?

> 
> root@kontron-mx8mm:~# echo on > /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/power/control

Is this usb root hub for your second usb port? If it's for your 1st port,
this just can indicate the 1st port can detect device if disable the whole
runtime suspend.

Can you show the full test log with both usb ports(usbotg1 and usbotg2)
Enabled? E.g, like if you let both usb ports runtime suspended, then
Either port will not work, then if you force the 2nd port on, then your
1st port will start work?

Li Jun

> root@kontron-mx8mm:~# [  194.523296] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device
> number 2 using ci_hdrc





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux