On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:04 PM Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On 4/28/22 19:36, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:54 AM Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This patch adds device-tree bindings for regulators on Silicon Mitus > >> SM5703 MFD. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../siliconmitus,sm5703-regulator.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/siliconmitus,sm5703-regulator.yaml > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/siliconmitus,sm5703-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/siliconmitus,sm5703-regulator.yaml > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..75ff16b58000 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/siliconmitus,sm5703-regulator.yaml > >> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > >> +%YAML 1.2 > >> +--- > >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/siliconmitus,sm5703-regulator.yaml# > >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >> + > >> +title: Silicon Mitus SM5703 multi function device regulators > >> + > >> +maintainers: > >> + - Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx> > >> + > >> +description: | > >> + SM5703 regulators node should be a sub node of the SM5703 MFD node. See SM5703 MFD > >> + bindings at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/siliconmitus,sm5703.yaml > >> + Regulator nodes should be named as USBLDO_<number>, BUCK, VBUS, LDO_<number>. > >> + The definition for each of these nodes is defined using the standard > >> + binding for regulators at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt. > >> + > >> +properties: > >> + buck: > >> + type: object > >> + $ref: regulators.yaml# > > The correct file is regulator.yaml. > I was applying all the suggestions, and I thought I had somehow made a > typo referring to a wrong file. > > Do I re-send the whole series with just the s/regulators/regulator/g? A > part of series has already been merged, do I not re-send the already > merged patches then? Just send an incremental patch fixing the file name. If there are then errors in the example, then you need to resend the MFD binding with the errors fixed. Unless Lee applies v5 before you do that, then you need an incremental fix for example. Rob
