On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:40:31AM +0000, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 19:21, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The additional nodes in the example referenced from the pinctrl node > > 'aspeed,external-nodes' properties are either incorrect (aspeed,ast2500-lpc) > > or not documented with a schema (aspeed,ast2500-gfx). There's no need to > > show these nodes as part of the pinctrl example, so just remove them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Nak. I welcome patches that add schemas for the undocumented compatibles instead. Otherwise, I will be turning on this check by default and nagging people to fix them. > This removes the information on how to use the bindings. Surely we > prefer to over document rather than under document? How is what the 'gfx' and 'lpc' nodes contain relevant to how the pinctrl binding works? If a user wants to know, then they should go look at the aspeed,ast2500-lpc/aspeed,ast2500-gfx bindings and their examples. Which brings up my secondary issue which is having the same example multiple times. It is multiple chances for errors (that I end up fixing). How do we know the example is even correct without any schema checks? The 'framebuffer' node is not in a valid location is the most obvious thing I see. Rob
