On 27/04/2022 12:00, allen-kh.cheng wrote: > I think there are two cases in mediatek efuse dirver now. > > Case 1, > const: mediatek,efuse is deprecated. > const: mediatek,mt8173-efuse is remained. All mediatek chipsets will > use mediatek,mt8173-efuse as fallback. > > Case 2, > const: mediatek,efuse is deprecated. > const: mediatek,mt8173-efuse is deprecated. > > All mediatek chipsets(include ediatek,mt8173-efuse) will use > mediatek,efuse as fallback. > > Which one do you think is better? Indeed, I forgot that mt8173 would also fallback to generic efuse. Indeed let's go with case 2, so your proposal before was correct. Best regards, Krzysztof