On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > There is a high potential of more than one of those regulators existing > on a board, so name the regulator according to the name provided in the > initdata instead of statically. No, this is pointless and broken. The core will already use the board-specific name to identify the regulator in diagnostics and so on, the name being supplied here is supposed to describe the regulator within the device.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
