On 22/04/2022 04:32, Jason-JH Lin wrote:
Hi CK,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 14:50 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
Hi, Jason:
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 17:41 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
Add mtk-mutex support for mt8195 vdosys0.
Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 87
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
index aaf8fc1abb43..729ee88035ed 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
#define MT8183_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
#define MT8183_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x2c
+#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
+#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF 0x2c
This is identical to mt8183, so use mt8183 one instead of creating
new
one.
Regards,
CK
I'll fix this in the next version.
Please send this as a follow-up fix on top of:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/log/?h=v5.18-next/soc
Regards,
Matthias
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin.
+static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8195_mutex_driver_data = {
+ .mutex_mod = mt8195_mutex_mod,
+ .mutex_sof = mt8195_mutex_sof,
+ .mutex_mod_reg = MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
+ .mutex_sof_reg = MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF,
+};
+
