On Friday, September 12, 2014 02:05:53 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:36:02PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > To give callers the option of acting on a errors while removing the > > pm_domain ops for the device in the ACPI PM domain, let > > acpi_dev_pm_detach() return an int to provide the error code. > > So how would callers handle the errors? As far as I can see > acpi_dev_pm_detach() is called from ->remove() and ->shutdown() methods, where > there is no meaningful strategy to handle errors as you are past the point of > no return and you keep on tearing down the device. This is specifically for what patch [3/9] is doing AFAICS. The existing callers don't need to worry about this. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
