Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Add counter to prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 15/04/22 08:14, Hsin-Yi Wang ha scritto:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 1:59 PM Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To prevent infinite loop when tracking voltage, we calculate the maximum
value for each platform data.
We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
min_volt_shift for each iteration.
The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.

Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'm sorry Rex, but this commit has to be squashed with 09/15, as the logic is
that each commit has to be acceptable, and 09/15 is not, without this fix.

Besides, as Hsin-Yi suggested, calculating this every time may hit performance,
but at the same time I don't want to lose this explicit calculation...

---
  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
index cc44a7a9427a..d4c00237e862 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -86,6 +86,16 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
         struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
         struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
         int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
+       int retry_max;
+
+       /*
+        * We assume min voltage is 0 and tracking target voltage using
+        * min_volt_shift for each iteration.
+        * The retry_max is 3 times of expeted iteration count.
+        */
+       retry_max = 3 * DIV_ROUND_UP(max(info->soc_data->sram_max_volt,
+                                        info->soc_data->proc_max_volt),
+                                    info->soc_data->min_volt_shift);

mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking() will be called very frequently.
retry_max is the same every time mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking() is
called. Is it better to calculate before and store in
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info?


...so I agree with this solution: perhaps you can add a "vtrack_max" variable to
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info as suggested, and fill in that one in function
mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(), where we effectively initialize all-the-things.

Cheers,
Angelo



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux