On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 04:28:51PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 06:47, Xin Ji <xji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 12:52:14PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 08:09:54PM +0800, Xin Ji wrote:
> > > > Change bus-type define for DPI.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: a43661e7e819 ("dt-bindings:drm/bridge:anx7625:add vendor define")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Ji <xji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml
> > > > index 0d38d6fe3983..4590186c4a0b 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml
> > > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ properties:
> > > > remote-endpoint: true
> > > >
> > > > bus-type:
> > > > - enum: [1, 5]
> > > > + enum: [7]
> > >
> > > Changing is an ABI break, but didn't we revert adding this?
> > Hi Rob, sorry, what do you mean about ABI break? Do I need remove this
> > patch in this serial? Or do I need revert patch
> > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.freedesktop.org%2Fpatch%2F462331%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cxji%40analogixsemi.com%7C10f5b0213f434592936008da1d59f566%7Cb099b0b4f26c4cf59a0fd5be9acab205%7C0%7C0%7C637854569490105386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=vK0Vmb9S425kHZc1WurfnNhnoXDMbUGkkdY1PVnfS9g%3D&reserved=0, I don't know how to do
> > it.
> >
>
> I contributed to the confusion about this, let's see if we can clear it up.
>
> An issue was found related to which enum values were used to represent
> what late in the last release cycle. As a result a revert[1] patch for
> everything touching bus-type in anx7625 was merged.
>
> This patch, does not apply to drm-misc-next due to the revert, and if
> Xin Ji rebases his work on the drm-misc-next there should be no
> ABI-change as this patch when fixed up will introduce bus-type to the
> nax7625 ABI.
>
> Xin: Does this make sense to you?
Hi Robert Foss, yes, my work is based on drm-misc-next, all I can do,
just make a fix up patch(this patch) to change the bus-type define.
Thanks,
Xin
>
> [1] https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcgit.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fdrm-misc%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D979452fbc43028675b5a5da156f91928b739dea8&data=04%7C01%7Cxji%40analogixsemi.com%7C10f5b0213f434592936008da1d59f566%7Cb099b0b4f26c4cf59a0fd5be9acab205%7C0%7C0%7C637854569490105386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=onmKAoEEP1XDbl%2FaeAIfVYJ4cSbiTfTBYCd%2BHCA9fzw%3D&reserved=0
